Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Funders should evaluate projects, not people

11 references·5 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students3,373 cited
2009National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement1,148 cited
2011Framed by gender: how gender inequality persists in the modern world938 cited
2019Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency595 cited
1996Male-female differences: A computer simulation.410 cited
2015Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers233 cited
2018Scientific Autonomy, Public Accountability, and the Rise of “Peer Review” in the Cold War United States184 cited
2002A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT184 cited
2011Fund people not projects163 cited
2012From Bench to Board: Gender Differences in University Scientists' Participation in Corporate Scientific Advisory Boards91 cited
2016Blinding as a Solution to Bias : Strengthening Biomedical Science, Forensic Science, and Law83 cited

Cited by

2021Publication bias is the consequence of a lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion30 cited
2021Institutional-level drivers of gender-inequitable scientific career progression in sub-Saharan Africa22 cited
2019Peer review for the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia in 2016 and 2017: a retrospective analysis by reviewer and author gender

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited

2022Female ecologists are falling from the academic ladder: A call for action14 cited

2019Women Recipients of IADR Distinguished Scientist Awards13 cited