SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomized controlled trials in surgery and the glass ceiling effect
9 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Randomized controlled trials in surgery and the glass ceiling effect (2019)Randomized controlled trials in surgery a…Randomized controlled trials comparing surgery to non-operative management in neurosurgery: a systematic review (2019)Randomized controlled trials …Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered? (2015)Randomized controlled trials …Two Hundred Years of Surgery (2012)Two Hundred Years of SurgeryStandards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery (2010)Standards for reporting rando…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support (2011)Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Interpretation of CIs in clinical trials with non-significant results: systematic review and recommendations (2017)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (2001)Disciplinary Evolution and the Rise of the Transdiscipline (2014)Marines, medics, and machismo: Lack of fit with masculine occupational stereotypes discourages men's participation (2014)An Anesthesiologist’s Perspective on the History of Basic Airway Management (2019)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)Citation classics in neuro-oncology: assessment of historical trends and scientific progress (2017)Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials—Distance Travelled (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)The IDEAL framework in neurosurgery: a bibliometric analysis (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
  • 2012Two Hundred Years of Surgery212 cited
  • 2015Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?83 cited
  • 2010Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery65 cited
  • 2019Randomized controlled trials comparing surgery to non-operative management in neurosurgery: a systematic review23 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work