SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Análisis de la producción científica del Ecuador e impacto de la colaboración internacional en el periodo 2006-2015
16 references·6 citing·38 second hop
Análisis de la producción científica del Ecuador e impacto de la colaboración internacional en el periodo 2006-2015 (2019)Análisis de la producción científica del …The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…The Internationalization of Research in Europe (2015)The Internationalization of R…What is the best database for computer science journal articles? (2014)What is the best database for…Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa (2013)Research emphasis and collabo…Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain (2013)Developing human capital and …A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A Comparison between Two Main…The rise of research networks (2012)The rise of research networksSouth–South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) (2009)South–South research collabor…Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship (2006)Analysing Scientific Networks…The citation impact of research collaborations: the case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002) (2005)The citation impact of resear…The scientific impact of nations (2004)The scientific impact of nati…Building scientific capacity in developing countries (2004)Building scientific capacity …National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations (2001)National characteristics in i…Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate (2001)Collaboration, creativity and…Studying research collaboration using co-authorships (1996)Studying research collaborati…Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers (1991)Scientific co-operation in Eu…América Latina y la producción de artículos científicos: un crecimiento desigual y asimétrico (2023)América Latina y la producció…Analysis of Ecuador's SCOPUS scientific production during the 2001–2020 period by means of standardized citation indicators (2022)Analysis of Ecuador's SCOPUS …Producción científica y tecnológica de Perú en el contexto sudamericano: un análisis cienciométrico (2021)Producción científica y tecno…Caracterización de la producción científica de Ecuador en el periodo 2007–2017 en Scopus (2020)Caracterización de la producc…Análisis de la producción científica del Ecuador a través de la plataforma Web of Science (2020)Análisis de la producción cie…Análisis bibliométrico y cienciométrico de la producción científica de Perú y Ecuador desde Web of Science (2009-2018) (2020)Análisis bibliométrico y cien…Little Science, Big Science (1963)What is research collaboration? (1997)Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration (2004)Diaspora and Transnationalism : Concepts, Theories and Methods (2010)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)Science and Engineering Indicators (1993)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis (2014)Sub-Saharan African Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Research: A Decade of Development (2015)Visualizing Collaboration Characteristics and Topic Burst on International Mobile Health Research: Bibliometric Analysis (2018)International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group (2008)OUR FRUGAL FUTURE: LESSONS FROM INDIA'S INNOVATION SYSTEM (2012)Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields (2017)The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics (2020)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)Women are credited less in science than men (2022)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies (2004)The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration (2007)Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe (2010)BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators (2003)What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? (2004)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Six case studies of international collaboration in science (2005)How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers (2011)A Five-Dimensional Model of Creativity and its Assessment in Schools (2016)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)What do we measure by co-authorships? (2002)The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2013A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases1,930 cited
  • 2004The scientific impact of nations1,244 cited
  • 2006Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship821 cited
  • 2001National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations715 cited
  • 1996Studying research collaboration using co-authorships612 cited
  • 1991Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers443 cited
  • 2012The rise of research networks433 cited
  • 2001Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate161 cited
  • 2013Research emphasis and collaboration in Africa154 cited
  • 2004Building scientific capacity in developing countries153 cited
  • 2009South–South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC)140 cited
  • 2005The citation impact of research collaborations: the case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002)135 cited
  • 2013Developing human capital and research capacity: Science policies promoting brain gain123 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Internationalization of Research in Europe
119 cited
  • 2014What is the best database for computer science journal articles?112 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Análisis bibliométrico y cienciométrico de la producción científica de Perú y Ecuador desde Web of Science (2009-2018)37 cited
    • 2023América Latina y la producción de artículos científicos: un crecimiento desigual y asimétrico36 cited
    • 2020Caracterización de la producción científica de Ecuador en el periodo 2007–2017 en Scopus22 cited
    • 2021Producción científica y tecnológica de Perú en el contexto sudamericano: un análisis cienciométrico17 cited
    • 2020Análisis de la producción científica del Ecuador a través de la plataforma Web of Science16 cited
    • 2022Analysis of Ecuador's SCOPUS scientific production during the 2001–2020 period by means of standardized citation indicators14 cited