SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Adequate Reporting of Dental Diagnostic Accuracy Studies is Lacking: An Assessment of Reporting in Relation to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Statement
16 references·1 citing·38 second hopsampled
Adequate Reporting of Dental Diagnostic Accuracy Studies is Lacking: An Assessment of Reporting in Relation to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Statement (2019)Adequate Reporting of Dental Diagnostic A…STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: An Updated List o…Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy…Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD (2013)Reporting quality of diagnost…Quality and Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in TB, HIV and Malaria: Evaluation Using QUADAS and STARD Standards (2009)Quality and Reporting of Diag…Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: No Change Since STARD Statement Publication—Before-and-after Study (2008)Quality of Reporting of Diagn…The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement (2006)The quality of diagnostic acc…Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evidence of bias and variatio…Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2005)Quality of Reporting of Diagn…How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis? (2005)How does study quality affect…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals (2000)Publications on diagnostic te…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Empirical Evidence of Design-…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) guidelines: a development protocol (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for…Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Use of Methodological Standards in Diagnostic Test Research (1995)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1999Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests1,860 cited
  • 2015STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies1,353 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies612 cited
  • 2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
  • 2000Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals161 cited
  • 2005Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies138 cited
  • 2013Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD121 cited
  • 2014Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD113 cited
  • 2005How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

87 cited
  • 2009Quality and Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in TB, HIV and Malaria: Evaluation Using QUADAS and STARD Standards76 cited
  • 2008Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: No Change Since STARD Statement Publication—Before-and-after Study64 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Preferred Reporting Items for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Endodontics (PRIDASE) guidelines: a development protocol5 cited