SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey
9 references·1 citing·53 second hop
Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey (2019)Following Cochrane review protocols to co…The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review (2017)The influence of the team in …Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Grey literature in systematic…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…The Cochrane Collaboration at 20 (2013)The Cochrane Collaboration at…Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications (2012)Impact of document type on re…Unpublished data can be of value in systematic reviews of adverse effects: methodological overview (2010)Unpublished data can be of va…Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy (2009)Cochrane reviews used more ri…Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2008)Following 411 Cochrane Protoc…Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology (2006)Cochrane Skin Group systemati…Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades (2024)Comparative analysis of Cochr…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles (1994)Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part II (2014)Quantifying Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health: A Meta-Epidemiological Study (2014)Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases (2019)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Comparison of Pooled Risk Estimates for Adverse Effects from Different Observational Study Designs: Methodological Overview (2013)Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data (2016)Missing clinical trial data: the evidence gap in primary data for potential COVID-19 drugs (2021)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties (2012)Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses (2018)A practical guide to preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Outcomes in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Addressing Four Common Eye Conditions: An Evaluation of Completeness and Comparability (2014)Cherry-picking by trialists and meta-analysts can drive conclusions about intervention efficacy (2017)Practical guidance for using multiple data sources in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (with examples from the MUDS study) (2017)Effectiveness and Efficiency (1994)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses (2013)Evidence-Based Pathology: Systematic Literature Reviews as the Basis for Guidelines and Best Practices (2014)Challenging mental health related stigma in China: Systematic review and meta-analysis. I. Interventions among the general public (2017)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects (2011)What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection (2019)Risk and protective factors for mental health in elite athletes: a scoping review (2019)Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID‐19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks (2020)A systematic review and meta-analysis on adverse childhood experiences: Prevalence in youth offenders and their effects on youth recidivism (2023)How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians (2023)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2017Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews325 cited
  • 2009Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy201 cited
  • 2012Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications129 cited
  • 2006Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology73 cited
  • 2013The Cochrane Collaboration at 2070 cited
  • 2008Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study54 cited
  • 2017The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review54 cited
  • 2010Unpublished data can be of value in systematic reviews of adverse effects: methodological overview33 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work