Social Media Content Analysis of Public Diabetes Facebook Groups

Michael Stellefson · Samantha R. Paige · Avery Apperson · Susannah Spratt

67 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Media in Health Education Diabetes Management and Education Health Literacy and Information Accessibility

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Relatively little is known about how Facebook groups are used to facilitate diabetes self-management support. This study provides a critical analysis of public diabetes Facebook groups and their content. METHODS: Two trained researchers independently identified 34 public Facebook diabetes groups. A coding and classification scheme was applied to the 20 most recent "wall posts" within 15 of the 34 (44.1%) largest groups (n = 300 posts). Nonparametric Mann-Whiney U tests examined differences in group characteristics between groups with more (active) and less (inactive) than 50 posts in the past month. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations between group purpose, post types, membership (engagement leader vs regular user), and modality. RESULTS: We identified 193 458 members of the 34 largest diabetes Facebook groups (Mdn size = 3124 members, IQR = 1298-8523 members). Many groups (20/34, 58.8%) were created to provide instrumental support, while fewer (12/34, 35.8%) aimed to provide emotional support. Nutrition was the only diabetes self-management topic addressed in more than 30% of posts (n = 107). Posts made by engagement leaders were almost five times more likely to appear within inactive compared to active groups. DISCUSSION: Diabetes Facebook groups are used to share both information and emotional support, with greater emphasis placed on sharing information about nutrition. While engagement leaders should theoretically increase the credibility of online forums, frequent posts by group engagement leaders may actually lead to group decay. Health and diabetes educators should consider how to more effectively leverage social media engagement leaders to disseminate valid health information on diabetes self-management.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 67 citations exist upstream.

References

1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales 2002Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability 2013A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication 1981Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives 2014Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue 2011Seeking Support on Facebook: A Content Analysis of Breast Cancer Groups 2012Use of Social Media in Health Promotion 1996Sampling Error and Selecting Intercoder Reliability Samples for Nominal Content Categories

Cited by

2019Moving Beyond the Gym: A Content Analysis of YouTube as an Information Resource for Physical Literacy 2024Topic modeling and social network analysis approach to explore diabetes discourse on Twitter in India 2021Viral feminism: #MeToo networked expressions in feminist Facebook groups 2021Cruising to nowhere: Covid-19 crisis discourse in cruise tourism Facebook groups

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.