SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleDiversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity?

Loet Leydesdorff A2019

Article2019

Diversity measurement: Steps towards the measurement of interdisciplinarity?

Loet Leydesdorff A · Caroline S. Wagner · Lutz Bornmann

36 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Informetrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences 2007A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society 2009Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience 2007Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals 2012How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management 2015Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account 2019Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient 2018The repeat rate: from Hirschman to Stirling

Cited by

2024Is interdisciplinarity more likely to produce novel or disruptive research?2021Are bibliometric measures consistent with scientists’ perceptions? The case of interdisciplinarity in research 2022Diversity and interdisciplinarity: Should variety, balance and disparity be combined as a product or better as a sum? An information-theoretical and statistical estimation approach 2021

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2024How to measure interdisciplinary research? A systemic design for the model of measurementarticle · 8 shared references 2022Toward greater consistency and validity in measuring interdisciplinarity: a systematic and conceptual evaluationarticle · 7 shared references 2021Are bibliometric measures consistent with scientists’ perceptions? The case of interdisciplinarity in researcharticle · 7 shared references 2022Interdisciplinarity and impact: the effects of the citation time windowarticle · 6 shared references 2023Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel-winning research in the past 120 yearsarticle · 6 shared references 2021The Scientometric Measurement of Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in the Research Portfolios of Chinese Universitiesarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typearticle

Published2019-04-01

VenueJournal of Informetrics

ISSN-L1751-1577

Languageen

Citations36

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.016

openalex_workW2928422743

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

The Scientometric Measurement of Interdisciplinarity and Diversity in the Research Portfolios of Chinese Universities

2023Interdisciplinarity affects the technological impact of scientific research

2022Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?