Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on the Adoption of Electric Bicycles in British Columbia

Saki Aono · Alexander York Bigazzi

24 citations0/0 files storedTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure Transportation and Mobility Innovations

Abstract

Electric-assist bicycles (e-bikes) are an emerging mode of transportation that offers a sustainable alternative to automobile use in urban areas. Past research on e-bike adoption has focused on user perspectives. Understanding other stakeholder perspectives is also essential to implementing effective e-bike policy. The objectives of this research are to identify alignments and misalignments in perspectives on e-bike adoption across industry stakeholders in British Columbia (BC), including e-bike retailers, manufacturers, cycling coalitions, and government agencies, and to provide recommendations for e-bike policy that account for those perspectives. An online survey was distributed to industry stakeholders to examine perceived barriers to adoption, expected impacts of adoption, and effects of policy on adoption. Questions about regulations discriminated between five e-bike types: pedal-assist, throttle-assist, scooter-style, electric recumbents, and enclosed electric recumbents. Results indicate strong agreement among industry stakeholders that scooter-style e-bikes require separate and additional regulation from other types of e-bikes and from existing regulation in BC. In contrast, there was misalignment in the expected mode shift resulting from e-bike adoption, with government agencies least optimistic about diversion of automobile trips. Industry stakeholders broadly agreed on the need for speed regulation and viewed higher speeds as one of the least important benefits of e-bikes, which contrasts with past research on user perspectives. Policy recommendations include reclassifying scooter-style e-bikes, rebate or tax programs to reduce e-bike costs, further research on optimal e-bike speed limits, and continued support for improvements in general cycling infrastructure (a top priority for industry and user stakeholders).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

2015E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research 2014Technology adoption of electric bicycles: A survey among early adopters 2011E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions 2014Electric Bikes in North America 2017To what extent do e-bikes substitute travel by other modes? Evidence from the Netherlands 2012Electric Bikes and Transportation Policy 2015Estimating cycleway capacity and bicycle equivalent unit for electric bicycles 2018Exploring e‐bikes as a mode of sustainable transport: A temporal qualitative study of the perspectives of a sample of novice riders in a Canadian city

Cited by

2024A scoping review of the design and characteristics of e-bike financial incentives 2021A policy review of electric personal assistive mobility devices 2024Travel behaviour and greenhouse gas impacts of income-conditioned e-bike purchase incentives 2024Reflections on urban E-bike governance: lessons from the Guangzhou case

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.