SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Substantial numbers of easily identifiable illegal DOIs still exist in Scopus
7 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Substantial numbers of easily identifiable illegal DOIs still exist in Scopus (2019)Substantial numbers of easily identifiabl…DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science (2018)DOI errors and possible solut…Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed (2017)Availability of digital objec…The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus (2016)The museum of errors/horrors …Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science (2016)Empirical analysis and classi…Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus (2016)Availability of digital objec…A response to “The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus” by Franceschini et al. (2016)A response to “The museum of …Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases (2014)Errors in DOI indexing by bib…A matter of time: Publication dates in Scopus (2024)A matter of time: Publication…The secrets behind Web of Science’s DOI search (2019)The secrets behind Web of Sci…The counting house (2002)Customer Behavior Modeling in Revenue Management and Auctions: A Review and New Research Opportunities (2007)The Modern Call Center: A Multi‐Disciplinary Perspective on Operations Management Research (2007)Are Mendeley reader counts useful impact indicators in all fields? (2017)Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure (2013)Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community (2014)Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns (2015)Avanços na composição da Methodi Ordinatio para revisão sistemática de literatura (2018)A review and extension of the flow experience concept. Insights and directions for Tourism research (2021)A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023)The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits (2002)San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (2013)The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study (2013)The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis (2017)General discussion of data quality challenges in social media metrics: Extensive comparison of four major altmetric data aggregators (2018)Regional resilience: a stretched concept? (2018)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough (2019)Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research (2021)Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases (2022)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Types of DOI errors of cited references in Web of Science with a cleaning method (2019)Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers (2020)Article-Level Metrics (2021)The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science's three journal citation indexes (2016)Bibliometric analysis of fuzzy theory research in China: A 30-year perspective (2017)Bibliometric analysis for highly cited papers in operations research and management science from 2008 to 2017 based on Essential Science Indicators (2018)Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: causes, consequences, and solutions (2021)A revisit to the specification of sub-datasets and corresponding coverage timespans when using Web of Science Core Collection (2023)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Half a century of Anales de Pediatría. Evolution of its main bibliometric indicators in the Web of Science and Scopus international databases (2019)Identification of national research output using Scopus/Web of Science Core Collection: a revisit and further investigation (2023)Red alert: Millions of “homeless” publications in Scopus should be resettled (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science223 cited
  • 2016The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus119 cited
  • 2016Availability of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in Web of Science and Scopus93 cited
  • 2014Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases66 cited
  • 2018DOI errors and possible solutions for Web of Science48 cited
  • 2017Availability of digital object identifiers in publications archived by PubMed43 cited
  • 2016A response to “The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus” by Franceschini et al.16 cited

Cited by

  • 2024A matter of time: Publication dates in Scopus11 cited
  • 2019The secrets behind Web of Science’s DOI search11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work