Is all publicity good publicity? The impact of direct and indirect media pressure on the adoption of governance practices

Andrew V. Shipilov · Henrich R. Greve · Tim J. Rowley

83 citations0/0 files storedStrategic Management Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Identity and Reputation Corporate Finance and Governance Management and Organizational Studies

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary Media coverage is known to influence firms' behavior, but it is less known whether coverage of firms' partners also has an effect. In a context of governance practices' diffusion in Canada, we distinguish the effect of direct media coverage of the firm's activities, from indirect coverage, defined as media coverage of the firms' interlock partners. We examine whether the coverage is laden with positive or negative emotions. We find that both direct and indirect media coverage have a strong effect on firms' adoption of practices, either when the tone is positive or negative. The findings indicate that media coverage has broader and deeper effects on firms' actions than previously known. Managerial Summary Firms are under pressure from many outside stakeholders who want them to change. This pressure is felt strongly when it is expressed through mass media attention to the firms or their practices, and often persuades management to make changes. We examine the effect of media coverage on changes in governance practices, finding that media influences reach all the way to the board. In addition, we find that both critique and praise can lead a firm to make changes in its governance practices. The media attention does not even have to be directed to the firm itself: when media targets companies that share common directors with the focal firm, the firm's board usually responds by adopting governance practices as if media targeted the firm.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 83 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 2004The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields 1983Separation of Ownership and Control 1995Institutions and organizations 2001Bad is Stronger than Good 1991Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes 1988Organizational Learning

Cited by

2024ESG as a nonmarket strategy to cope with geopolitical tension: Empirical evidence from multinationals' ESG performance 2020Going above and beyond: How intermediaries enhance change in emerging economy institutions to facilitate small to medium enterprise development 2021The Diffusion of Differences: A Review and Reorientation of 20 Years of Diffusion Research 2022Insight into the driving force of environmental performance improvement: Environmental regulation or media coverage 2024Corporate hypocrisy and ESG rating divergence

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.