PENERAPAN FILSAFAT PEMIDANAAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Abstract

ABSTRACT When the judges tried to understand a certain text, he was influenced by an existing perperception associated with the text. The philosophy of punishment applied by the judges in this court decision could be viewed from this context. With this background, the author believed that even though the judge have tried to accommodate the value and merit of legal certainty in the decision, but the value of justice that they tried to bring forth was still not ideal yet, mainly in consideration of the fact that corruption has been categorized a serious crime in this country. Keywords: philosophy of punishment, corruption, serious crime ABSTRAK Apabila hakim senantiasa terpaku untuk memahami teks yang sudah pasti (aturan hukum), maka dapat dipastikan pandangannya akan terpengaruh oleh teks tersebut. Hakim dalam memutuskan perkara juga didasarkan pada falsafah pemidanaannya. Berdasarkan latar belakang di atas, penulis percaya bahwa hakim dalam putusan ini mencoba mengakomodir nilai dan manfaat kepastian hukum dalam memutuskan perkara, sementara nilai keadilan masih belum mendapatkan porsi yang tepat. Padahal, nilai keadilan masih menjadi tataran ideal terutama dalam mempertimbangkan fakta kasus korupsi yang dikategorikan kejahatan serius di negara ini justru terbaikan. Kata kunci: filosofi hukuman, korupsi, kejahatan berat

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.