Promoting health through housing improvements, education and advocacy: Lessons from staff involved in Wellington's Healthy Housing Initiative

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Improving the conditions of housing through programs that trigger when children are hospitalised has the potential to prevent further ill-health and re-hospitalisations. Exploring the attitudes and beliefs of staff involved in such a program assists in understanding the advantages and challenges of this approach. METHODS: We interviewed 21 people involved in a regional initiative to improve the health outcomes of children through referral to a housing program. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were subsequently subjected to qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants identified a number of factors that were key to the success of the program, such as: visiting the home, having health and energy organisations work together, and an integrated approach that includes interventions as well as education and advocacy. Key challenges to the program's aim of improving health outcomes for children were landlords' reluctance to implement improvements, homeowners' inability to afford improvements, limitations to staff resources, and client stress and income constraints, which meant that some interventions did not necessarily lead to housing improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve health outcomes through housing interventions should be supported by funding and regulatory initiatives that encourage property owners to implement recommended interventions. SO WHAT?: This program represents an encouraging step towards health promotion through housing interventions and education. However, the initiative cannot fully counter structural challenges such as poor quality housing, and lack of housing and energy affordability. This study highlights the potential for a holistic approach to health promotion in housing, which integrates health initiatives with advocacy for regulatory support.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.