Popular Punishment

Unknown author

34 citations0/0 files storedOxford University Press eBooks

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Criminal Justice and Penology Criminal Law and Policy Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Abstract

Contributors Introduction: Exploring the Normative Significance of Public Opinion for State Punishment, Jesper Ryberg and Julian V. Roberts Chapter 1: Penal Theory, Moral Intuitions, and Public Opinion, Jesper Ryberg Chapter 2: Proportionality Theory and Popular Opinion, Matt Matravers Chapter 3: The Proper Role of Community in Determining Criminal Liability and Punishment, Paul H. Robinson Chapter 4: Proportionality in Sentencing: The Need to Factor in Community Experience, Not Public Opinion, Mirko Bagaric Chapter 5: Penal Theory and Popular Opinion: The Deficiencies of Direct Engagement, Jan W. de Keijser Chapter 6: Why Should We Care What the Public Thinks? A Critical Assessment of the Claims of Popular Punishment, Frej K. Thomsen Chapter 7: Public Opinion and Democratic Control of Sentencing Policy, Christopher Bennett Chapter 8: Criminal Prosecutors: Experts or Elected Officials?, Richard L. Lippke Chapter 9: Stakeholder Sentencing, Thom Brooks Chapter 10: Repellent Institutions and the Absentee Public: Grounding Opinion in Responsibility for Punishment, Albert W. Dzur Chapter 11: Clarifying the Significance of Public Opinion for Sentencing Policy and Practice, Julian V. Roberts Notes Bibliography Index

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

References

2000Plural Policing and Democratic Governance 2003Penal Populism and Public Opinion Lessons from Five Countries 1997Virtues of the mind: an inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge 2000Punishment, Communication, and Community 1993A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights 2010Developing Group‐Deliberative Virtues

Cited by

2019Taking Crime Seriously: Conservation Values and Legal Cynicism as Predictors of Public Perceptions of the Seriousness of Crime 2020Legitimacy and public opinion: a five-step model 2016Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study 2018Punishment and Human Dignity: Sentencing Principles for Twenty-First-Century America 2014Sentencing, Legitimacy, and Public Opinion 2017Retributivism and Public Opinion: On the Context Sensitivity of Desert 2018Knowledge, punitive attitudes and punitive gap: Finnish findings

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.