SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Access Journals in the Middle East and Iran
11 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Open Access Journals in the Middle East and Iran (2019)Open Access Journals in the Middle East a…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Setting New Publishing Standards after the Beall's List (2018)Setting New Publishing Standa…Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science (2017)Predatory Publishing Is a Thr…Predatory journals and their effects on scientific research community (2017)Predatory journals and their …Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals (2017)Identifying Predatory or Pseu…Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement (2017)Core competencies for scienti…"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process (2017)"Predatory Journals" or "Pred…The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)The Pressure to Publish More …The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…A snapshot of medical journals from the Middle East (2006)A snapshot of medical journal…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research (2020)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Publish or Perish (2007)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Influence of Internet and Social Media in the Promotion of Alternative Oncology, Cancer Quackery, and the Predatory Publishing Phenomenon (2018)Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap (2018)A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences (2020)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Analysis of thirteen predatory publishers: a trap for eager-to-publish researchers (2017)An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals (2019)Critical Thinking and Scientific Writing Skills of Non-Anglophone Medical Students: a Model of Training Course (2019)Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Predatory journals and dishonesty in science (2017)Predatory Publishing: An Industry that Is Threatening Science (2018)Predatory journals: what can we do to protect their prey? (2025)Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals (2017)Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals (2017)What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AMA manual of style: a guide for authors and editors (2007)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2017)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals (2019)Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study (2019)Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access (2013)Measuring Academic Leadership Using Research Performance (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review559 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review182 cited
  • 2016The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities94 cited
  • 2017Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement82 cited
  • 2017Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science42 cited
  • 2017Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals33 cited
  • 2006A snapshot of medical journals from the Middle East15 cited
  • 2018Setting New Publishing Standards after the Beall's List14 cited
  • 2017Predatory journals and their effects on scientific research community13 cited
  • 2017"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process12 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work