SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings
9 references·1 citing·34 second hop
Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings (2019)Overview of randomised controlled trials …Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals (2013)Risk of bias of randomized co…Improvement of research quality in the fields of orthopaedics and trauma—a global perspective (2013)Improvement of research quali…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials (2008)The orthopaedic trauma litera…Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. (1999)Factors that limit the qualit…A review of trauma and orthopaedic randomised clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals (2021)A review of trauma and orthop…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)“Publish or Perish” Promotes Medical Literature Quantity Over Quality (2018)An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals (2018)The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)Measuring Agreement between Two Judges on the Presence or Absence of a Trait (1975)A power primer. (1992)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013–2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals (2020)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. (2000)A Qualitative Study (2009)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)METHODOLOGICAL INDEX FOR NON-RANDOMIZED STUDIES ( MINORS ): DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT (2003)A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Delphi List (1998)Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 1999Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials.390 cited
  • 2013Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals83 cited
  • 2008The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials27 cited
  • 2013Improvement of research quality in the fields of orthopaedics and trauma—a global perspective17 cited

Cited by

  • 2021A review of trauma and orthopaedic randomised clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work