Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions

15 references·16 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
2014Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact377 cited
2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
2010Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images185 cited
2011Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?156 cited
2016The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles153 cited
2013Brazilian citation scheme outed115 cited
2014Plagiarism in Scientific Research and Publications and How to Prevent It100 cited
2009Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)94 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1998Preventing scientific misconduct.89 cited

Cited by

2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
2020A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences57 cited
2023Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices54 cited
2022Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey36 cited
2024Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years33 cited
2019Novice Researchers’ Views About Online Ethics Education and the Instructional Design Components that May Foster Ethical Practice29 cited
2021Evolution of research on honesty and dishonesty in academic work: a bibliometric analysis of two decades29 cited
2022Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature during the Pandemic Years 2020 and 202128 cited
2023Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review24 cited
2023Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses23 cited
2020An Analysis of Retracted Articles with Authors or Co-authors from the African Region: Possible Implications for Training and Awareness Raising22 cited
2023Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations22 cited
2021Retracted papers by Iranian authors: causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations19 cited
2022Evolution and characterization of health sciences paper retractions in Brazil and Portugal16 cited
2021Reasons and implications of retracted articles in Brazil16 cited
2022Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted15 cited