SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Training Change Agents how to Implement Formal Preference Assessments: a Review of the Literature
16 references·2 citing·33 second hop
Training Change Agents how to Implement Formal Preference Assessments: a Review of the Literature (2019)Training Change Agents how to Implement F…Findings Across Practitioner Training Studies in Special Education: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)Findings Across Practitioner …A Meta-Analysis of Educator Training to Improve Implementation of Interventions for Students With Disabilities (2016)A Meta-Analysis of Educator T…Teaching Receptive Language Skills (2013)Teaching Receptive Language S…EVALUATION OF A SELF‐INSTRUCTION PACKAGE FOR CONDUCTING STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (2012)EVALUATION OF A SELF‐INSTRUCT…Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reprint—Preferred Reporting I…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…EVALUATING THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK AND CONTINGENT MONEY FOR STAFF TRAINING OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS (2006)EVALUATING THE RELATIVE EFFEC…The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education (2005)The Use of Single-Subject Res…Preparing Teachers in Evidence-Based Practices for Young Children With Autism (2004)Preparing Teachers in Evidenc…TRAINING STAFF TO CONDUCT A PAIRED‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (2002)TRAINING STAFF TO CONDUCT A P…How to Summarize Single-Participant Research: Ideas and Applications (2001)How to Summarize Single-Parti…EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT (1998)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULU…Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. (1996)Integrating caregiver report …EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES (1996)EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIM…A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES (1992)A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHE…ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS (1985)ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFER…Systematic Review of Procedures and Outcomes of Choice-Based Interventions with Children (2023)Systematic Review of Procedur…The Importance of Professional Discourse for the Continual Advancement of Practice Standards: The RBT® as a Case in Point (2020)The Importance of Professiona…Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. (1968)SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1 (1968)REINFORCER VARIATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MOTIVATING DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN (1981)AN IMPLICIT TECHNOLOGY OF GENERALIZATION 1 (1977)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling and Video Self-Modeling Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders (2007)Combining Nonoverlap and Trend for Single-Case Research: Tau-U (2011)Research Methods in Psychology (2016)EVALUATION OF A BRIEF MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT IN A NATURALISTIC CONTEXT (2000)SKILL ACQUISITION IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY (2000)THE EFFECTS OF VIDEOTAPE MODELING ON STAFF ACQUISITION OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY (2007)THE EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL SKILLS TRAINING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PICTURE EXCHANGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (2009)Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change (1976)SOCIAL VALIDITY: THE CASE FOR SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENT or HOW APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IS FINDING ITS HEART 1 (1978)Defining empirically supported therapies. (1998)An Improved Effect Size for Single-Case Research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs (2008)Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards (2012)Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, (1966)ON THE LAW OF EFFECT 1 (1970)USING A CHOICE ASSESSMENT TO PREDICT REINFORCER EFFECTIVENESS (1996)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)TREATMENT OF PICA THROUGH MULTIPLE ANALYSES OF ITS REINFORCING FUNCTIONS (1998)AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MATCHED STIMULI ON BEHAVIORS MAINTAINED BY AUTOMATIC REINFORCEMENT (2000)Problem Behavior Interventions for Young Children with Autism: A Research Synthesis (2002)Stereotypy I: A review of behavioral assessment and treatment (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2005The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education3,580 cited
  • 2009Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2,496 cited
  • 1992A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES1,701 cited
  • 1996EVALUATION OF A MULTIPLE‐STIMULUS PRESENTATION FORMAT FOR ASSESSING REINFORCER PREFERENCES1,417 cited
  • 1985ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS650 cited
  • 1998EVALUATION OF A BRIEF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT470 cited
  • 1996Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.335 cited
  • 2001How to Summarize Single-Participant Research: Ideas and Applications253 cited
  • 2002TRAINING STAFF TO CONDUCT A PAIRED‐STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT175 cited
  • 2004Preparing Teachers in Evidence-Based Practices for Young Children With Autism162 cited
  • 2013Teaching Receptive Language Skills145 cited
  • 2017Findings Across Practitioner Training Studies in Special Education: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis133 cited
  • 2012EVALUATION OF A SELF‐INSTRUCTION PACKAGE FOR CONDUCTING STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

108 cited
  • 2016A Meta-Analysis of Educator Training to Improve Implementation of Interventions for Students With Disabilities107 cited
  • 2006EVALUATING THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK AND CONTINGENT MONEY FOR STAFF TRAINING OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE ASSESSMENTS104 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020The Importance of Professional Discourse for the Continual Advancement of Practice Standards: The RBT® as a Case in Point23 cited
    • 2023Systematic Review of Procedures and Outcomes of Choice-Based Interventions with Children23 cited