SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Fragmented publishing: a large-scale study of health science
16 references·0 citing·55 second hop
Fragmented publishing: a large-scale study of health science (2019)Fragmented publishing: a large-scale stud…Temporal characteristics of retracted articles (2018)Temporal characteristics of r…Researchers’ risk-smoothing publication strategies: Is productivity the enemy of impact? (2018)Researchers’ risk-smoothing p…Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)Researchers’ Individual Publi…Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications (2016)Randomized trials are frequen…Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published (2014)Data dredging, salami-slicing…Current incidence of duplicate publication in otolaryngology (2013)Current incidence of duplicat…Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer (2012)Self-Plagiarism in Academic P…On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007) (2010)On the prevalence and scienti…Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences (2010)Negative changes in the scien…Duplicate publication and ‘salami slicing’: Ethical issues and practical solutions (2008)Duplicate publication and ‘sa…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)Multiple publication on a sin…Duplicate publications: redundancy in plastic surgery literature (2006)Duplicate publications: redun…Redundant surgical publications: Tip of the iceberg? (2001)Redundant surgical publicatio…Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific misconduct or necessity? (1998)Redundant publication in biom…In Defense of the Least Publishable Unit (1990)In Defense of the Least Publi…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How to write and publish a scientific paper (1990)Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (1992)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Multiparametric characterization of scientometric performance profiles assisted by neural networks: a study of Mexican higher education institutions (2016)Is positive publication bias really a bias, or an intentionally created discrimination toward negative results? (2019)A review of the literature on ethical issues related to scientific authorship (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Self-Plagiarism and Textual Recycling: Legitimate Forms of Research Misconduct (2013)Plagiarism in medical scientific research (2015)Text Recycling in Scientific Writing (2018)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Work-related factors and violence among nursing staff in the European NEXT study: A longitudinal cohort study (2007)Violence risks in nursing--results from the European 'NEXT' Study (2008)Self-plagiarism and unfortunate publication: an essay on academic values (2012)Lessons learned from applying Sandelowski and Barroso’s approach for synthesising qualitative research (2019)The national system of researchers in Mexico: implications of publication incentives for researchers in social sciences (2019)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Learning Styles (2008)Practical significance: Moving beyond statistical significance (2015)Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors’ Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review (2017)Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender (2018)Irresponsible Authorship and Wasteful Publication (1986)Fraude y conductas inapropiadas en las publicaciones científicas (2010)Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers’ Perceptions in Spain (2021)The Ingelfinger Rule Revisited (1991)Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1991)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-use? (2009)Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis (2017)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers (2016)Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research (2018)How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions (2018)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Analysis of retractions in Indian science (2019)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property (1988)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication (2008)Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)Modelling count response variables in informetric studies: Comparison among count, linear, and lognormal regression models (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2016Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century204 cited
  • 2001Redundant surgical publications: Tip of the iceberg?155 cited
  • 2014Data dredging, salami-slicing, and other successful strategies to ensure rejection: twelve tips on how to not get your paper published111 cited
  • 2018Temporal characteristics of retracted articles107 cited
  • 2007Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine75 cited
  • 2012Self-Plagiarism in Academic Publishing: The Anatomy of a Misnomer74 cited
  • 2010Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences52 cited
  • 2008Duplicate publication and ‘salami slicing’: Ethical issues and practical solutions48 cited
  • 1998Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific misconduct or necessity?47 cited
  • 2006Duplicate publications: redundancy in plastic surgery literature36 cited
  • 2016Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications32 cited
  • 1990In Defense of the Least Publishable Unit30 cited
  • 2018Researchers’ risk-smoothing publication strategies: Is productivity the enemy of impact?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

29 cited
  • 2010On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007)28 cited
  • 2013Current incidence of duplicate publication in otolaryngology23 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.