No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The article aims to study the jurisprudence of the European Court of human rights on respect of\nthe correspondence contained in article 8 of the European Convention on human rights. Study\npart of the expansion of the concept of the mentioned standard correspondence in jurisprudence,\nto encompass the telematic media company and deals with the study of the doctrine of the ECHR\non the privacy of communications in the labour relations, focusing on the STEDH (Great Hall)\n9-5-2017, Barbulescu affair. The statement estimated that the mere prohibition does not justify the\npure sacrifice of worker communications privacy, but understands legitimate business meddling in\nso far as its policy to effect exceeds the test of legitimacy that the Court sets. This statement represents\na breakthrough in the clarification of criteria to be considered in the application of article 8\nECHR, but it’s a step forward that should be relative bearing in mind that, aside from this ruling,\nthe ECHR considers it necessary to rating decisions challenged in the light of the whole of the\ncause and to respect the margin of appreciation which have national courts, sufficing to the Court\nwith the same argumentation is relevant and sufficient.
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.