Depression and risk of disability pension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sohrab Amiri · Sepideh Behnezhad

37 citations0/0 files storedThe International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Retirement, Disability, and Employment Mental Health Treatment and Access Workplace Health and Well-being

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Depression is a common mental disorder that leads to undesirable consequences. The study of the role of depression in disability pension can provide valuable insights. This study was conducted with the goal of systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between depression and disability pension. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched until March 2018. Fifteen prospective cohort studies were selected and included in the meta-analysis. The random-effects method was used to combine the studies. Subgroup analysis was performed, and publication bias was also examined. RESULTS: Depression was a risk factor for disability pension (pooled risk ratio =1.68 and 95% confidence interval = 1.50-1.88). In men, pooled risk ratio was 1.82 for the effect of depression on the risk of disability pension (95% confidence interval = 1.45-2.28). In women, pooled risk ratio was 1.62 (95% confidence interval = 1.31-2.02). The results showed that there is publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is a factor for retirement due to disability. Therefore, the prevention and treatment of depression can reduce socioeconomic and psychological consequences imposed on society.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 37 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis 2005Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication 1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias

Cited by

2020Trajectories of Religious Change From Adolescence to Adulthood, and Demographic, Environmental, and Psychiatric Correlates

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.