SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
On the skewness of journal self‐citations and publisher self‐citations: Cues for discussion from a case study
16 references·5 citing·45 second hop
On the skewness of journal self‐citations and publisher self‐citations: Cues for discussion from a case study (2019)On the skewness of journal self‐citations…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)What I learned from predatory…A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of theory and practi…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)Coercive Citation in Academic…Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing (2011)Open access, readership, cita…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Retractions in the scientific…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial (2008)Open access publishing, artic…Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003)Self‐citation and self‐refere…Theories of citation? (1998)Theories of citation?Problems of citation analysis (1996)Problems of citation analysisIntroduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1991)Introduction to informetrics:…Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…Comparison of journal and top publisher self-citation rates in COVID-19 research (2024)Comparison of journal and top…Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles (2022)Do retraction practices work …Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context (2021)Self-citation and citation of…Researcher Performance in Scopus Articles (RPSA) as a New Scientometric Model of Scientific Output: Tested in Business Area of V4 Countries (2021)Researcher Performance in Sco…Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)Recommendations from the Redu…Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. (1984)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (1988)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)Expert credibility in climate change (2010)The Scientific Community. (1966)Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities (1974)Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond (1986)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Making Open Science a Reality (2015)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)The politics of publication (2003)Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research (2012)The Altmetrics Collection (2012)Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Coauthorship within the United States (2015)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization (1991)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits (2015)A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science (2016)Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview (2017)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional (1998)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2015A review of theory and practice in scientometrics1,000 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 1996Problems of citation analysis499 cited
  • 2012Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing433 cited
  • 2008Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial419 cited
  • 2010Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?404 cited
  • 1998Theories of citation?347 cited
  • 1991Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science324 cited
  • 2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
  • 2003Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

303 cited
  • 2011Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing298 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles20 cited
    • 2021Self-citation and citation of top journal publishers and their interpretation in the journal-discipline context16 cited
    • 2021Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project13 cited
    • 2024Comparison of journal and top publisher self-citation rates in COVID-19 research10 cited
    • 2021Researcher Performance in Scopus Articles (RPSA) as a New Scientometric Model of Scientific Output: Tested in Business Area of V4 Countries8 cited