SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleEvaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against?

Albert Banal‐Estañol2019

Article2019

Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against?

Albert Banal‐Estañol · Inés Macho‐Stadler · David Pérez‐Castrillo

43 citations·0/0 files stored·Research Policy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Research, Science, and Academia scientometrics and bibliometrics research Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

References

1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 1961Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms 1984Choices, values, and frames.2013Choices, Values, and Frames 2007What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations 1977Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women 1989Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?2004Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda.

Cited by

2019Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA 2022Funding Risky Research 2022Spreading knowledge and technology: Research efficiency at universities based on the three-stage MCDM-NRSDEA method with bootstrapping 2022Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from ERC Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking 2023Distrust in grant peer review—reasons and remedies

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2023Similar‐to‐me effects in the grant application process: Applicants, panellists, and the likelihood of obtaining fundsarticle · 13 shared references 2021Industry Collaborations of Research Teams: Are They Penalized or Rewarded in the Grant Evaluation Process?article · 13 shared references 2024Greenlighting Innovative Projects: How Evaluation Structure Shapes the Perceived Feasibility of Early-Stage Ideaspreprint · 12 shared references 2022Exploring the antecedents of interdisciplinarity at the European Research Council: a topic modeling approacharticle · 10 shared references 2020Interdisciplinary knowledge combinations and emerging technological topics: Implications for reducing uncertainties in research evaluationarticle · 10 shared references 2020Division of labor in collaborative knowledge production: The role of team size and interdisciplinarityarticle · 9 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typearticle

Published2019-05-07

VenueResearch Policy

ISSN-L0048-7333

Languageen

Citations43

Files0 public / 0

ShelfResearch, Science, and Academia

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.008

openalex_workW2944469448

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022Gender diversity of research consortia contributes to funding decisions in a multi-stage grant peer-review process

2021Funding Risky Research

2025Funding and productivity: Does winning grants affect the scientific productivity of recipients? Evidence from the social sciences and economics