SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
An analysis of current practices in undertaking literature reviews in nursing: findings from a focused mapping review and synthesis (2019)An analysis of current practices in under…Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2022)Systematic Approaches to a Su…Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Time to challenge the spuriou…The impact of emotional intelligence in health care professionals on caring behaviour towards patients in clinical and long-term care settings: Findings from an integrative review (2018)The impact of emotional intel…HOW TO DO A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IN NURSING: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE (2016)HOW TO DO A SYSTEMATIC LITERA…The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews (2015)The Joanna Briggs Institute r…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2010)Designing and Conducting Mixe…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the thematic synt…Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Designing and Conducting Mixe…The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The integrative review: updat…Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review (2005)Meta‐synthesis method for qua…Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation (2015)Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses (2018)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies (2020)A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm (2020)Narrative Reviews: Flexible, Rigorous, and Practical (2022)Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures (2014)Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire (2015)How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design (2017)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)Bridging the Qualitative–Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems1 (2013)A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2007Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research23,260 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2005The integrative review: updated methodology10,189 cited
  • 2010Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research9,356 cited
  • 2008Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews9,266 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,561 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses1,374 cited
  • 2018Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?1,254 cited
  • 2005Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review1,245 cited
  • 2022Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review1,173 cited
  • 2015The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews1,135 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses385 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The impact of emotional intelligence in health care professionals on caring behaviour towards patients in clinical and long-term care settings: Findings from an integrative review
229 cited
  • 2016HOW TO DO A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IN NURSING: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE213 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.