SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
“This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of Time”: Reviewer Etiquette Matters
5 references·2 citing·30 second hop
“This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of Time”: Reviewer Etiquette Matters (2019)“This Manuscript Was a Complete Waste of …The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review (2015)The Social and Psychological …Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals (2012)Becoming a peer reviewer to m…The Silent Majority: Manuscript Rejection and Its Impact on Scholars (2011)The Silent Majority: Manuscri…The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in Medical Education (2008)The reviewer is always right:…Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community – Results from an international study (2008)Peer review in scholarly jour…Maintaining Standards or Gatekeeping the Academy? Reflections of Peer Review Experiences by Racially and Culturally Minoritized Scholars in Australia (2025)Maintaining Standards or Gate…Editorial Decision Making for Academic Medicine, 2021 (2020)Editorial Decision Making for…Psychology of intergroup relations (1986)The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. (1995)The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior (2004)CARE AND COMPASSION THROUGH AN ORGANIZATIONAL LENS: OPENING UP NEW POSSIBILITIES. (2012)Decolonizing journals in management and organizations? Epistemological colonial encounters and the double translation (2022)Stress adaptation and resilience of academics in higher education (2023)What makes a good reviewer of manuscripts? (1998)Twelve tips for getting your manuscript published (2015)Group Peer Review: The Breakfast of Champions (2016)Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review (2017)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Peer review in health sciences (2002)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Writing for publication in medical education in high impact journals. (2014)Ten steps to 4C/ID: training differentiation skills in a professional development program for teachers (2021)Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (1969)Stress, appraisal, and coping (1985)Stress: Appraisal and Coping (2013)Theory in humanitarian operations research (2016)Non-English Nativeness As Stigma in Academic Settings (2017)Exploring the role of rejection in scholarly knowledge production: Insights from granular interaction thinking and information theory (2024)Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts (2001)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations (2020)Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature (1987)Decolonising Methodologies Research and Indigenous Peoples (2000)Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide (2015)Collaborative Peer-Supported Review of Teaching (2013)Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)Ten considerations for open peer review (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Silent Majority: Manuscript Rejection and Its Impact on Scholars107 cited
  • 2008Peer review in scholarly journals: Perspective of the scholarly community – Results from an international study102 cited
  • 2015The Social and Psychological Costs of Peer Review57 cited
  • 2012Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals48 cited
  • 2008The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in Medical Education41 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Editorial Decision Making for Academic Medicine, 202110 cited
  • 2025Maintaining Standards or Gatekeeping the Academy? Reflections of Peer Review Experiences by Racially and Culturally Minoritized Scholars in Australia8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work