SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Baseline P value distributions in randomized trials were uniform for continuous but not categorical variables
3 references·6 citing·23 second hop
Baseline P value distributions in randomized trials were uniform for continuous but not categorical variables (2019)Baseline P value distributions in randomi…Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)Data fabrication and other re…Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Systematic review and statist…The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)The analysis of 168 randomise…Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author group (2025)Assessing the scientific inte…Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? (2024)Publication integrity: what i…Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns (2022)Distributions of baseline cat…Evidence and risk indicators of non‐random sampling in clinical trials in implant dentistry: A systematic appraisal (2021)Evidence and risk indicators …An investigation of seven other publications by the first author of a retracted paper due to doubts about data integrity (2021)An investigation of seven oth…Participant withdrawals were unusually distributed in randomized trials with integrity concerns: a statistical investigation (2020)Participant withdrawals were …Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences (2007)Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem (2021)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Check for publication integrity before misconduct (2020)Identical summary statistics were uncommon in randomized trials and cohort studies (2021)A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project (2024)Evidence for non‐random sampling in randomised, controlled trials by Yuhji Saitoh (2016)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The reporting and methodological quality of split‐mouth trials in oral implantology: A methodological study (2022)Relevant domains, core outcome sets and measurements for implant dentistry clinical trials: The Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurement ( ID‐COSM) international consensus report (2023)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)Choosing between methods of combining $p$-values (2017)False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)Just Post It (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID ‐19 pandemic (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity254 cited
  • 2017Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals229 cited
  • 2016Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials108 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?25 cited
  • 2020Participant withdrawals were unusually distributed in randomized trials with integrity concerns: a statistical investigation17 cited
  • 2021An investigation of seven other publications by the first author of a retracted paper due to doubts about data integrity15 cited
  • 2022Distributions of baseline categorical variables were different from the expected distributions in randomized trials with integrity concerns13 cited
  • 2021Evidence and risk indicators of non‐random sampling in clinical trials in implant dentistry: A systematic appraisal11 cited
  • 2025Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author group10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work