SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal
8 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Rethinking impact factors: better ways to judge a journal (2019)Rethinking impact factors: better ways to…Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Thinking with indicators. Exp…Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (2017)Authorship and citation manip…Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses (2016)Bibliometrics and Research Ev…Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation (2016)Bibliometrics and Research Ev…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Assessing the impact of planned social change (1979)Assessing the impact of plann…Beyond declarations: Metrics, rankings and responsible assessment (2024)Beyond declarations: Metrics,…Predicting the Future Popularity of Academic Publications Using Deep Learning by Considering It as Temporal Citation Networks (2023)Predicting the Future Popular…Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA and CoARA for hiring and promotion in psychology (2022)Responsible Research Assessme…Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: Taking Medicine, General and Internal journals as an example (2022)Research on the discourse pow…Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] (2021)Use of the journal impact fac…The lack of meaningful boundary differences between journal impact factor quartiles undermines their independent use in research evaluation (2021)The lack of meaningful bounda…Inferring the causal effect of journals on citations (2021)Inferring the causal effect o…Does the Financial Times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals? (2021)Does the Financial Times FT50…Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields (2021)Comparing perceptions of the …A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers (2021)A credit-like rating system t…Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? (2020)Use of the journal impact fac…The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking (2020)The Matthew effect of a journ…National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance (2020)National Lists of Scholarly P…Hot trends and impact in permafrost science (2020)Hot trends and impact in perm…Are Altmetric.com scores effective for research impact evaluation in the social sciences and humanities? (2020)Are Altmetric.com scores effe…Measuring Societal Impact Is as Complex as ABC (2019)Measuring Societal Impact Is …Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (1977)Moments, Mixed Methods, and Paradigm Dialogs (2010)Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation (2010)Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment (2016)Social Theory and Social Structure (1958)Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. (1971)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Implicated in the Indicator Game? An Experimental Debate (2017)Ten simple rules for responsible referencing (2018)Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis (2019)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)GENERATING RESEARCH QUESTIONS THROUGH PROBLEMATIZATION. (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h -index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia (2019)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Job Market Signaling (1973)The Matthew effect impacts science and academic publishing by preferentially amplifying citations, metrics and status (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (1995)Bibliometric assessment of national scientific journals (2020)Do bibliometrics introduce gender, institutional or interdisciplinary biases into research evaluations? (2023)In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles? (2023)Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)The global ranking game: narrowing academic excellence through numerical objectification (2018)The research trends and contributions of System's publications over the past four decades (1973–2017): A bibliometric analysis (2018)A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries (2021)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)Research Focuses, Trends, and Major Findings on Project Complexity: A Bibliometric Network Analysis of 50 Years of Project Complexity Research (2018)A longitudinal analysis of university rankings (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 1979Assessing the impact of planned social change864 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2016Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation235 cited
  • 2017Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research205 cited
  • 2017Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences145 cited
  • 2016Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses93 cited

Cited by

  • 2020National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance62 cited
  • 2020The Matthew effect of a journal's ranking60 cited
  • 2021Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]49 cited
  • 2022Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA and CoARA for hiring and promotion in psychology40 cited
  • 2020Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not?39 cited
  • 2024Beyond declarations: Metrics, rankings and responsible assessment

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

38 cited
  • 2021Inferring the causal effect of journals on citations38 cited
  • 2021Does the Financial Times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals?38 cited
  • 2020Are Altmetric.com scores effective for research impact evaluation in the social sciences and humanities?34 cited
  • 2021A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers29 cited
  • 2023Predicting the Future Popularity of Academic Publications Using Deep Learning by Considering It as Temporal Citation Networks29 cited
  • 2020Hot trends and impact in permafrost science29 cited
  • 2019Measuring Societal Impact Is as Complex as ABC28 cited
  • 2021The lack of meaningful boundary differences between journal impact factor quartiles undermines their independent use in research evaluation28 cited
  • 2021Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields27 cited
  • 2022Research on the discourse power evaluation of academic journals from the perspective of multiple fusion: Taking Medicine, General and Internal journals as an example26 cited