SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Violence against children and natural disasters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative evidence
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
Violence against children and natural disasters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative evidence (2019)Violence against children and natural dis…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World (2011)A Global Perspective on Child…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)A basic introduction to fixed…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)Contour-enhanced meta-analysi…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters (2005)At Risk: Natural Hazards, Peo…Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy (2003)Breaking the Conflict Trap: C…The world report on violence and health (2002)The world report on violence …60,000 Disaster Victims Speak: Part I. An Empirical Review of the Empirical Literature, 1981–2001 (2002)60,000 Disaster Victims Speak…Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Methods for Meta-Analysis in …At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters (1994)At Risk: Natural Hazards, Peo…Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review (2021)Natural hazards, disasters an…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis (2013)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The ecology of human development : experiments by nature and design (1979)The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design (1980)Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults (1998)Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence (2006)Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study (2008)The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature (2008)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards * (2003)Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters (2005)A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2002The world report on violence and health9,110 cited
  • 2010A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis6,786 cited
  • 1994At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters6,284 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2005At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters3,317 cited
  • 200260,000 Disaster Victims Speak: Part I. An Empirical Review of the Empirical Literature, 1981–20013,123 cited
  • 2003Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy2,430 cited
  • 2008Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry2,046 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World2,009 cited
  • 2000Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research1,795 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Natural hazards, disasters and violence against women and girls: a global mixed-methods systematic review251 cited