SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis
16 references·9 citing·41 second hop
An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis (2019)An empirical comparison of Bayesian model…GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence (2017)GRADE guidelines 17: assessin…GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)GetReal in network meta‐analy…Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015 (2016)Bibliographic study showed im…Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis (2015)Automated generation of node‐…Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis (2014)Predictive distributions for …Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks (2014)Characteristics of Networks o…Addressing Dichotomous Data for Participants Excluded from Trial Analysis: A Guide for Systematic Reviewers (2013)Addressing Dichotomous Data f…Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers (2013)Addressing continuous data fo…Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical methods and numeric…Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Checking consistency in mixed…Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials (2008)Imputation methods for missin…Uncertainty method improved on best–worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis (2005)Uncertainty method improved o…Measuring agreement in method comparison studies (1999)Measuring agreement in method…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Quantifying the robustness of primary analysis results: A case study on missing outcome data in pairwise and network meta‐analysis (2021)Quantifying the robustness of…Pattern-mixture model in network meta-analysis of binary missing outcome data: one-stage or two-stage approach? (2021)Pattern-mixture model in netw…Continuous(ly) missing outcome data in network meta-analysis: A one-stage pattern-mixture model approach (2021)Continuous(ly) missing outcom…A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions (2021)A Revised Framework to Evalua…Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study (2020)Potential impact of missing o…Comparison of exclusion, imputation and modelling of missing binary outcome data in frequentist network meta-analysis (2020)Comparison of exclusion, impu…A Tutorial of Bland Altman Analysis in A Bayesian Framework (2020)A Tutorial of Bland Altman An…Participants' outcomes gone missing within a network of interventions: Bayesian modeling strategies (2019)Participants' outcomes gone m…Modeling missing binary outcome data while preserving transitivity assumption yielded more credible network meta-analysis results (2018)Modeling missing binary outco…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes (2018)Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis (2019)Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Using the bayesmeta R Package (2020)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1985)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Network Meta-Analysis Using R: A Review of Currently Available Automated Packages (2014)Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons (2017)Psychological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis (2020)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery (2009)Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges (2010)Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder (2010)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2014)Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies (1983)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual (2007)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Understanding Bland Altman analysis (2015)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 1999Measuring agreement in method comparison studies9,616 cited
  • 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial3,764 cited
  • 2010Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis2,517 cited
  • 2012Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 21,206 cited
  • 2015Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis701 cited
  • 2014Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis410 cited
  • 2016GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology401 cited
  • 2008Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials352 cited
  • 2005Uncertainty method improved on best–worst case analysis in a binary meta-analysis239 cited
  • 2017GRADE guidelines 17: assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant outcome data in a body of evidence163 cited
  • 2013Addressing Dichotomous Data for Participants Excluded from Trial Analysis: A Guide for Systematic Reviewers156 cited
  • 2013Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

141 cited
  • 2016Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015138 cited
  • 2014Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks127 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2020Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study33 cited
    • 2021Quantifying the robustness of primary analysis results: A case study on missing outcome data in pairwise and network meta‐analysis31 cited
    • 2020A Tutorial of Bland Altman Analysis in A Bayesian Framework17 cited
    • 2018Modeling missing binary outcome data while preserving transitivity assumption yielded more credible network meta-analysis results17 cited
    • 2021Continuous(ly) missing outcome data in network meta-analysis: A one-stage pattern-mixture model approach13 cited
    • 2021Pattern-mixture model in network meta-analysis of binary missing outcome data: one-stage or two-stage approach?9 cited
    • 2020Comparison of exclusion, imputation and modelling of missing binary outcome data in frequentist network meta-analysis8 cited
    • 2021A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions7 cited
    • 2019Participants' outcomes gone missing within a network of interventions: Bayesian modeling strategies6 cited