SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Large publishing consortia produce higher citation impact research but coauthor contributions are hard to evaluate
16 references·6 citing·45 second hop
Large publishing consortia produce higher citation impact research but coauthor contributions are hard to evaluate (2019)Large publishing consortia produce higher…Science of science (2018)Science of scienceA manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014)Team size matters: Collaborat…Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology (2013)Understanding life together: …Studying scientific migration in Scopus (2012)Studying scientific migration…An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing (2012)An empirical analysis of the …Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration (2012)Acquisition of European resea…A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks (2010)A unified approach to mapping…Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program (2009)Funding incentives, collabora…The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities (2006)Canadian collaboration networ…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results (1998)The influence of internationa…The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New production of knowled…Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond (1986)Little Science, Big Science..…The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs (2022)The interplay of the size of …Comparing standard, collaboration and fractional CNCI at the institutional level: Consequences for performance evaluation (2022)Comparing standard, collabora…The dominance of big teams in China’s scientific output (2021)The dominance of big teams in…The citation impact of articles from which authors gained monetary rewards based on journal metrics (2021)The citation impact of articl…Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time (2021)Domestic researchers with lon…Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia (2020)Greater female first author c…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies (2004)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015 (2015)Which factors influence the international mobility of research scientists? (2015)Scientists have most impact when they're free to move (2017)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer (2017)Little Science, Big Science (1963)What is research collaboration? (1997)Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns (2015)Exploratory Research (2020)The unequal impact of parenthood in academia (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems (2000)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research (2008)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 1995The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies7,046 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,605 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2010A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks2,237 cited
  • 2018Science of science1,494 cited
  • 1986Little Science, Big Science...and Beyond855 cited
  • 2014Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900479 cited
  • 2012Studying scientific migration in Scopus340 cited
  • 2009Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: Evidence from the EU framework program287 cited
  • 1998The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results261 cited
  • 2006Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities215 cited
  • 2012An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing179 cited
  • 2012Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

122 cited
  • 2013Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology98 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021The dominance of big teams in China’s scientific output22 cited
    • 2020Greater female first author citation advantages do not associate with reduced or reducing gender disparities in academia11 cited
    • 2021The citation impact of articles from which authors gained monetary rewards based on journal metrics10 cited
    • 2022Comparing standard, collaboration and fractional CNCI at the institutional level: Consequences for performance evaluation10 cited
    • 2022The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs9 cited
    • 2021Domestic researchers with longer careers generate higher average citation impact but it does not increase over time9 cited