SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review
16 references·16 citing·38 second hopsampled
Unravelling the gender productivity gap in science: a meta-analytical review (2019)Unravelling the gender productivity gap i…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisThe gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? (2018)The gender gap in science: Ho…Women in Academic Science (2014)Women in Academic ScienceScience faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)Science faculty’s subtle gend…Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis (2012)Methodological issues and adv…Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Understanding current causes …Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Outlier and influence diagnos…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisDoes Father Care Mean Fathers Share? (2006)Does Father Care Mean Fathers…Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. (2003)Transformational, transaction…Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups (1996)Ethnic Diversity and Creativi…The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science (1993)The Matthew Matilda Effect in…The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gender gap in research productivity within academia (2023)The effect of the COVID-19 pa…Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective (2023)Factors that affect scientifi…Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration (2023)Exploring Gender Bias in Six …Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks: analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens (2022)Women and key positions in sc…Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines (2022)Reject and Resubmit: A Formal…Community voices: the importance of diverse networks in academic mentoring (2022)Community voices: the importa…Winners and Losers in Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is the Gender Gap Widening for Faculty? (2021)Winners and Losers in Academi…The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards, 2001–2020 (2021)The gender gap in highly pres…The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia (2021)The 100,000 most influential …Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments (2021)Research assessments should r…Potential solutions for discrimination in STEM (2021)Potential solutions for discr…An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council (2021)An intersectional approach to…Research performance and age explain less than half of the gender pay gap in New Zealand universities (2020)Research performance and age …Improving sex and gender identity equity and inclusion at conservation and ecology conferences (2020)Improving sex and gender iden…Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers (2020)Gender gaps in scientific per…Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa (2020)Gender gaps in research produ…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009)Why so Few Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (2010)Gender Similarities and Differences (2013)Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions (2016)The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (2018)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. (2012)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Annual Research Review: A meta‐analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents (2015)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations (1987)The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization (1991)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)The gender similarities hypothesis. (2005)The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. (1982)Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences (1997)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities (2013)Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? (2016)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
  • 2012Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students3,139 cited
  • 2010Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis2,932 cited
  • 2003Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men.2,553 cited
  • 2011Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science1,116 cited
  • 2012Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis1,027 cited
  • 2014Women in Academic Science1,020 cited
  • 1993The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science1,008 cited
  • 2006Does Father Care Mean Fathers Share?992 cited
  • 1996Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups860 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?770 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration140 cited
    • 2021The gender gap in highly prestigious international research awards, 2001–2020126 cited
    • 2020Research performance and age explain less than half of the gender pay gap in New Zealand universities104 cited
    • 2020Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa78 cited
    • 2022Community voices: the importance of diverse networks in academic mentoring64 cited
    • 2020Improving sex and gender identity equity and inclusion at conservation and ecology conferences49 cited
    • 2023The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gender gap in research productivity within academia33 cited
    • 2021Potential solutions for discrimination in STEM32 cited
    • 2021Winners and Losers in Academic Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Is the Gender Gap Widening for Faculty?32 cited
    • 2020Gender gaps in scientific performance: a longitudinal matching study of health sciences researchers28 cited
    • 2021An intersectional approach to analyse gender productivity and open access: a bibliometric analysis of the Italian National Research Council24 cited
    • 2021The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia24 cited
    • 2022Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines24 cited
    • 2022Women and key positions in scientific collaboration networks: analyzing central scientists’ profiles in the artificial intelligence ecosystem through a gender lens17 cited
    • 2021Research assessments should recognize responsible research practices — Narrative review of a lively debate and promising developments17 cited
    • 2023Factors that affect scientific publication in Africa—A gender perspective16 cited