SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good, The Bad and The Ugly · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleEverything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Ann T. Gregory2019

Article2019

Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Ann T. Gregory · Alan Robert Denniss

25 citations·0/0 files stored·Heart Lung and Circulation

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 2002The history of the peer-review process 2018An Introduction to Writing Narrative and Systematic Reviews — Tasks, Tips and Traps for Aspiring Authors 2014Publishing: The peer-review scam 2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2016Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews 2010Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial

Cited by

2020Quantifying gender disparity in physician authorship among commentary articles in three high-impact medical journals: an observational study 2022Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review 2022Research Methods: How to Perform an Effective Peer Review 2021THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS IN ASIA

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews: A methodological reviewreview · 3 shared references 2012The A nna K arenina principle: A way of thinking about success in sciencearticle · 3 shared references 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer reviewarticle · 3 shared references 2017The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help?review · 3 shared references 2016Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the processreview · 3 shared references 2017Review the ‘peer review’article · 3 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typearticle

Published2019-06-20

VenueHeart Lung and Circulation

ISSN-L1443-9506

Languageen

Citations25

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.171

openalex_workW2950151801

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.