References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
• 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
• 2006The case of the misleading funnel plot1,759 cited
• 2001A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis1,286 cited
• 2012The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science800 cited
• 2012A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories603 cited
• 2011Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis519 cited
• 2011Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.493 cited
• 2013Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews357 cited
• 2015Estimating the Difference Between Published and Unpublished Effect Sizes234 cited
• 2018Infants’ evaluation of prosocial and antisocial agents: A meta-analysis.209 cited
• 2018Promoting Replicability in Developmental Research Through Meta-analyses: Insights From Language Acquisition Research161 cited