II—Relativist Stances, Virtues And Vices

Martin Kusch

21 citations0/0 files storedAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophical Ethics and Theory Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Abstract

This paper comments on Maria Baghramian’s ‘The Virtues of Relativism’ (2019). We agree that some relativist positions are naturally couched as ‘stances’ and that it is fruitful to connect relativism to virtue epistemology. But I find Baghramian’s preferred rendering of relativism uncharitable.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives.2016Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?1977Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. By Paul Feyerabend. (Atlantic Highlands, N.J. and London: Humanities Press, 1975. Pp. 339. $16.50.)1976Against Method, Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.2005On Bullshit 1983Rationality and relativism 1987Philosophie des Geldes.1978Science in a Free Society

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.