this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
- 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
- 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
- 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
- 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
- 2007Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists3,822 cited
- 2011Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?1,885 cited
- 1962The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.1,824 cited
- 2014Scientific method: Statistical errors1,536 cited
- 2008Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated1,489 cited
- 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
- 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
- 2015The fickle P value generates irreproducible results766 cited
- 2017Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work