Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How hyped media and misleading editorials can influence impressions about Beall’s lists of “predatory” publications

16 references·2 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2017The Power of Bias in Economics Research634 cited
2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
2017Stop this waste of people, animals and money284 cited
2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature273 cited
2017Predatory journals recruit fake editor238 cited
1995The rhetoric of research131 cited
2017The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School105 cited
2018What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia?89 cited
2018Format Aside: Applying Beall's Criteria to Assess the Predatory Nature of both OA and Non-OA Library and Information Science Journals65 cited
2018Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals53 cited
2012To hype, or not to(o) hype48 cited
2017Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: beware!42 cited
2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

It's All How You “Spin” It

34 cited

Cited by

2020Reproducibility issues with correlating Beall-listed publications and research awards at a small Canadian business school10 cited
2022Reflections on the disappearance of Dolos list, a now-defunct “predatory” publishing blacklist7 cited