No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Abstract Using the 138,751 patents filed in 2006 under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, co‐classification analysis is pursued on the basis of three‐ and four‐digit codes in the International Patent Classification (IPC, 8th ed.). The co‐classifications among the patents enable us to analyze and visualize the relations among technologies at different levels of aggregation. The hypothesis that classifications might be considered as the organizers of patents into classes, and therefore that co‐classification patterns—more than co‐citation patterns—might be useful for mapping, is not corroborated. The classifications hang weakly together, even at the four‐digit level; at the country level, more specificity can be made visible. However, countries are not the appropriate units of analysis because patent portfolios are largely similar in many advanced countries in terms of the classes attributed. Instead of classes, one may wish to explore the mapping of title words as a better approach to visualize the intellectual organization of patents.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 99 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.