SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Asymmetric Polarization on Twitter and the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections
11 references·4 citing·42 second hop
Asymmetric Polarization on Twitter and the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections (2019)Asymmetric Polarization on Twitter and th…Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (2018)Network Propaganda: Manipulat…Network Propaganda (2018)Network PropagandaInfluencers in Polarized Political Networks on Twitter (2018)Influencers in Polarized Poli…Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization (2018)Exposure to opposing views on…Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online (2017)Media Manipulation and Disinf…The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model: Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It (2016)The Russian "Firehose of Fals…The Multiple Facets of Influence (2014)The Multiple Facets of Influe…Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective (2014)Investigating Political Polar…The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The case for motivated reason…The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign (1968)The People's Choice: How the …The People’S Choice (1968)The People’S ChoicePolitical communication on social media in Latin America: unequal use of Twitter by members of parliament (2023)Political communication on so…Group polarization, influence, and domination in online interaction networks: a case study of the 2022 Brazilian elections (2023)Group polarization, influence…Why it is important to consider negative ties when studying polarized debates: A signed network analysis of a Dutch cultural controversy on Twitter (2021)Why it is important to consid…Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter (2020)Going viral: How a single twe…Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (1956)Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (1956)Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models (2006)Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics (2008)Political Polarization in the American Public (2008)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks (2001)Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity (2004)Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments (2016)Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes – Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences (2018)The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries (2018)Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002)The Myth of Digital Democracy (2008)Does Campaigning on Social Media Make a Difference? Evidence From Candidate Use of Twitter During the 2015 and 2017 U.K. Elections (2019)The Rise of Political Influencers—Perspectives on a Trend Towards Meaningful Content (2021)Political Influencers on Social Media: An Introduction (2023)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology (1999)False-Positive Psychology (2011)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)The Effects of Frequency Knowledge on Consumer Decision Making (1987)Beyond News Contents (2019)Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy (2020)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Political sectarianism in America (2020)The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views (2020)Social Media, News Consumption, and Polarization: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2021)Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election (2017)Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research (2020)A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems (2020)Causes and consequences of mainstream media dissemination of fake news: literature review and synthesis (2020)Disinformation as Political Communication (2020)“Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content (2019)American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective (2020)Citizens and the State (1998)The Dynamics of Protest Diffusion: Movement Organizations, Social Networks, and News Media in the 1960 Sit-Ins (2006)Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes? (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The case for motivated reasoning.9,014 cited
  • 1968The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign2,414 cited
  • 2018Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization1,860 cited
  • 2018Network Propaganda1,500 cited
  • 2017Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online923 cited
  • 2018Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics756 cited
  • 1968The People’S Choice603 cited
  • 2016The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model: Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It343 cited
  • 2014Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective280 cited
  • 2014The Multiple Facets of Influence263 cited
  • 2018Influencers in Polarized Political Networks on Twitter68 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter208 cited
  • 2021Why it is important to consider negative ties when studying polarized debates: A signed network analysis of a Dutch cultural controversy on Twitter27 cited
  • 2023Political communication on social media in Latin America: unequal use of Twitter by members of parliament10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2023
Group polarization, influence, and domination in online interaction networks: a case study of the 2022 Brazilian elections
9 cited