SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Basic Research Support by the Russian Science Foundation: What Can We Learn from the First Grant Competition?
11 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Basic Research Support by the Russian Science Foundation: What Can We Learn from the First Grant Competition? (2017)Basic Research Support by the Russian Sci…The Effect of Public Funding on Research Output: the New Zealand Marsden Fund (2015)The Effect of Public Funding …Project selection in NIH: A natural experiment from ARRA (2015)Project selection in NIH: A n…Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? (2015)Big names or big ideas: Do pe…The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity (2011)The impact of research grant …The ups and downs of peer review (2007)The ups and downs of peer rev…Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research In Economics (2005)The Impact of NSF Support for…Incentives in Basic Research (1996)Incentives in Basic ResearchWhat makes basic research economically useful? (1991)What makes basic research eco…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceThe Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research (1959)The Simple Economics of Basic…How do Russian Researchers Evaluate Grants as a Tool for the Development of Science? (2023)How do Russian Researchers Ev…Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. (1976)Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence (2000)Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory (2000)University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda (2007)A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour (1938)Assessment of techno-entrepreneurship projects by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (2018)Scientific prizes and the extraordinary growth of scientific topics (2021)Uncertainty and risk-taking in science: Meaning, measurement and management in peer review of research proposals (2022)Real Effects of Academic Research (1989)Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations (1993)The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation (2015)A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation (2019)The New Encyclopaedia Britannica (1991)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The Social System (1951)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Communication And Persuasion (2017)Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory (1984)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)“Sticky Information” and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation (1994)The Effect of Government Contracting on Academic Research: An Empirical Analysis of Reputation in Research Procurement (2002)Incentives and Invention in Universities (2003)Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules (2018)The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT (2012)The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF Research Grants (2021)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science7,959 cited
  • 1959The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research2,976 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2011The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity543 cited
  • 1991What makes basic research economically useful?522 cited
  • 2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
  • 2015Big names or big ideas: Do peer-review panels select the best science proposals?225 cited
  • 2005The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research In Economics99 cited
  • 1996Incentives in Basic Research66 cited
  • 2015Project selection in NIH: A natural experiment from ARRA42 cited
  • 2015The Effect of Public Funding on Research Output: the New Zealand Marsden Fund17 cited

Cited by

  • 2023How do Russian Researchers Evaluate Grants as a Tool for the Development of Science?4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work