SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The quality of reporting RCT abstracts in four major orthodontics journals for the period 2012–2017
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
The quality of reporting RCT abstracts in four major orthodontics journals for the period 2012–2017 (2019)The quality of reporting RCT abstracts in…Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting (2014)Active implementation strateg…Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals (2013)Reporting Quality of Abstract…Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011 (2012)Reporting quality of abstract…Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis (2012)Effect of editors' implementa…Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals (2012)Assessment of adherence to th…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science from 1986 to 2011 (2012)Assessing the Quality of Rand…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …How well do reports of clinical trials in the orthodontic literature comply with the CONSORT statement? (2010)How well do reports of clinic…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)Scales to Assess the Quality …Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts? (2006)Structured abstracts: Do they…Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: An audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score* (2005)Abstract reporting in randomi…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Bibliometric and visualized analysis of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics between 1991 and 2022 (2024)Bibliometric and visualized a…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)CONSORT: when and how to use it (2015)High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews (2016)Improving transparency and reproducibility through registration: The status of intervention trials published in clinical psychology journals. (2016)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review (2014)Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial (2015)Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)School and Community-Based Interventions for Refugee and Asylum Seeking Children: A Systematic Review (2014)Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P (2012)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Effectiveness of music therapy: a summary of systematic reviews based on randomized controlled trials of music interventions (2014)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2007Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review827 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
  • 2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited
  • 2014Active implementation strategy of CONSORT adherence by a dental specialty journal improved randomized clinical trial reporting92 cited
  • 2006Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts?86 cited
  • 2012Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 201171 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Dental Specialty Journals
44 cited
  • 2012Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science from 1986 to 201140 cited
  • 2010How well do reports of clinical trials in the orthodontic literature comply with the CONSORT statement?36 cited
  • 2005Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: An audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score*33 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Bibliometric and visualized analysis of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics between 1991 and 202211 cited