SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Translation studies and the ethics of publishing
16 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Translation studies and the ethics of publishing (2019)Translation studies and the ethics of pub…Publish or perish - perceived benefits versus unintended consequences (2019)Publish or perish - perceived…What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)What Value Do Journal Whiteli…The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals (2017)The Discourse of Peer Review:…The Discourse of Peer Review (2017)The Discourse of Peer ReviewJeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate (2017)Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” l…Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals (2016)Perish or Publish in China: P…Organizing Enlightenment (2016)Organizing EnlightenmentMemes of Translation (2016)Memes of TranslationPublishing and impact criteria, and their bearing on Translation Studies: In search of comparability (2015)Publishing and impact criteri…Organizing Enlightenment: information overload and the invention of the modern research university (2015)Organizing Enlightenment: inf…Committee on publication ethics (2010)Committee on publication ethi…Bibliometrics as Weapons of Mass Citation La bibliométrie comme arme de citation massive (2010)Bibliometrics as Weapons of M…A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2010)A European Code of Conduct fo…Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world (2007)Seeking acceptance in an Engl…Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting (1996)Judging the quality of resear…Performance indices and related measures of journal reputation in accounting (1989)Performance indices and relat…Yes! We’re open. Open science and the future of academic practices in translation and interpreting studies (2021)Yes! We’re open. Open science…Closing A Conceptual Gap: The Case For A Description Of English As A Lingua Franca (2001)A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing (2002)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation (2009)English as an international language of scientific publication: a study of attitudes (2011)Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice (2016)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)The consequences of modernity (1990)Research Methods in Education (2007)Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016) (2017)What price the building of world-class universities? Academic pressure faced by young lecturers at a research-centered University in China (2017)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019)A qualitative content analysis of watchlists vs safelists: How do they address the issue of predatory publishing? (2020)How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited (2020)Philosophical Investigations. (1954)The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (1981)Experiential Learning : Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (1983)Metaphorical and Interlingual Translation in Moving Organizational Practices Across Languages (2019)Translation and Affect (2020)Translation and Relevance (2021)The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences (1999)On Hype, Malpractice, and Scientific Misconduct in Organic Synthesis (2012)The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures (2017)The Matter of Facts (2020)Gender Equality in the Age of Academic Capitalism: Cassandra and Pollyanna Interpret University Restructuring (2015)Educated acquiescence: how academia sustains authoritarianism in China (2019)Abundance (2021)Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-use? (2009)Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing (2012)Journal Editors: Gatekeepers or Custodians? (2018)Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports (2020)Polycentric Peer Reviewing: Navigating Authority and Expertise (2022)Scientific misbehavior in economics (2014)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)LOYAL WORKERS AND DISTINGUISHED SCHOLARS: BIG HUMANITIES AND THE ETHICS OF KNOWLEDGE (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity511 cited
  • 2007Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world364 cited
  • 2016Memes of Translation204 cited
  • 2010Committee on publication ethics201 cited
  • 2016Perish or Publish in China: Pressures on Young Chinese Scholars to Publish in Internationally Indexed Journals129 cited
  • 2016Organizing Enlightenment111 cited
  • 2015Organizing Enlightenment: information overload and the invention of the modern research university95 cited
  • 2018What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia?89 cited
  • 2010Bibliometrics as Weapons of Mass Citation La bibliométrie comme arme de citation massive65 cited
  • 2017The Discourse of Peer Review64 cited
  • 1989Performance indices and related measures of journal reputation in accounting55 cited
  • 1996Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accounting35 cited
  • 2017Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate25 cited
  • 2015Publishing and impact criteria, and their bearing on Translation Studies: In search of comparability24 cited
  • 2019Publish or perish - perceived benefits versus unintended consequences

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

23 cited
  • 2017The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals22 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Yes! We’re open. Open science and the future of academic practices in translation and interpreting studies7 cited