SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services
14 references·8 citing·37 second hop
Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services (2019)Building capacity for librarian support a…The hidden benefits of helping students with systematic reviews (2018)The hidden benefits of helpin…Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Roles for librarians in syste…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Impact of librarians on repor…Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors (2015)Use of Recommended Search Str…Systematic Reviews and Librarians: A Primer for Managers (2015)Systematic Reviews and Librar…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more (2015)All in the Family: systematic…Engaging Medical Librarians to Improve the Quality of Review Articles (2014)Engaging Medical Librarians t…Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies (2012)Empty Reviews: A Description …The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study. (2005)The librarian's roles in the …The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study (2003)The role of the information s…Programmatic instruction for systematic reviews: Developing an interdisciplinary framework for instruction and assessment (2024)Programmatic instruction for …Effect of librarian collaboration on otolaryngology systematic review and meta-analysis quality (2024)Effect of librarian collabora…Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study (2023)Why do researchers co‐author …University professional staff roles, identities, and spaces of interaction: systematic review of literature published in 2000–2020 (2023)University professional staff…Teaching Knowledge Synthesis Methods through Online Research Consultations (2023)Teaching Knowledge Synthesis …A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service (2023)A decade of systematic review…An environmental scan of librarian involvement in systematic reviews at Queen’s University: 2020 update (2021)An environmental scan of libr…A Return to Librarian Mediated Searching in A Pilot Systematic Search Service (2020)A Return to Librarian Mediate…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Systematic Reviews and Librarians (2006)It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)RAPID REVIEW: AN EMERGING APPROACH TO EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2014)Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews (2017)Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (2017)Using artificial intelligence methods for systematic review in health sciences: A systematic review (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Tips for Improving the Writing and Reporting Quality of Systematic, Scoping, and Narrative Reviews (2019)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Systematic reviews: A brief historical overview (2018)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)The Next Generation: Chatbots in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy to Foster Mental Health – A Scoping Review (2019)A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals (2020)A Knowledge Recombination Perspective of Innovation: Review and New Research Directions (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews330 cited
  • 2015All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more288 cited
  • 2012Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies220 cited
  • 2015Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors159 cited
  • 2018Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review156 cited
  • 2005The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study.111 cited
  • 2016Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews108 cited
  • 2003The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study84 cited
  • 2014Engaging Medical Librarians to Improve the Quality of Review Articles78 cited
  • 2015Systematic Reviews and Librarians: A Primer for Managers45 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
The hidden benefits of helping students with systematic reviews
11 cited

Cited by

  • 2023University professional staff roles, identities, and spaces of interaction: systematic review of literature published in 2000–202052 cited
  • 2021An environmental scan of librarian involvement in systematic reviews at Queen’s University: 2020 update16 cited
  • 2023Why do researchers co‐author evidence syntheses with librarians? A mixed‐methods study15 cited
  • 2023A decade of systematic reviews: an assessment of Weill Cornell Medicine's systematic review service11 cited
  • 2024Effect of librarian collaboration on otolaryngology systematic review and meta-analysis quality8 cited
  • 2020A Return to Librarian Mediated Searching in A Pilot Systematic Search Service7 cited
  • 2023Teaching Knowledge Synthesis Methods through Online Research Consultations1 cited
  • 2024Programmatic instruction for systematic reviews: Developing an interdisciplinary framework for instruction and assessment1 cited