Climate Litigation in the Global South: Constraints and Innovations

Joana Setzer · Lisa Benjamin

97 citations0/0 files storedTransnational Environmental Law

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental law and policy Judicial and Constitutional Studies International Environmental Law and Policies

Abstract

Abstract Cases involving climate change have been litigated in the courts for some time, but new directions and trends have started to emerge. While the majority of climate litigation has occurred in the United States and other developed countries, cases in the Global South are growing both in terms of quantity and in the quality of their strategies and regulatory outcomes. However, so far climate litigation in the Global South has received scant attention from the literature. We argue that climate litigation in the Global South opens up avenues for progress in addressing climate change in highly vulnerable countries. We first highlight some of the capacity constraints experienced in Global South countries to provide context for the emerging trend of strategic climate litigation in the area. In spite of significant constraints experienced, the strategies adopted by litigants push the climate litigation agenda forward as a result of their outward-looking objective of combating ongoing environmental degradation, and, on a doctrinal level, the way in which they link climate change and human rights. Bearing in mind the limitations resulting from the selective nature of the cases examined, we draw upon Legal Opportunity Structures (LOS) approaches and identify two reasons for innovative cases and outcomes in Global South strategic climate litigation: (i) how litigants are either overcoming or using procedural requirements for access to environmental justice, and (ii) the existence of progressive legislative and judicial approaches to climate change. The strategies and outcomes from these judicial approaches in the Global South might be able to contribute to the further development of transnational climate change litigation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 97 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010 2017A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?2012Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK 2019Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South 2018If at First You Don’t Succeed: Suing Corporations for Climate Change 2015Climate Change Litigation 2006Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements 2015Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy

Cited by

2021Global Lessons from Climate Change Legislation and Litigation 2023National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions 2023An integrated approach to corporate due diligence from a human rights, environmental, and TWAIL perspective 2021Rights-based approaches to climate decision-making 2020Climate Change Litigation: Trends, Policy Implications and the Way Forward

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.