SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta‐Reviews
16 references·16 citing·35 second hopsampled
Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta‐Reviews (2019)Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Me…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)Systematic review finds overl…Beyond PICO (2012)Beyond PICORobust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates (2010)Robust variance estimation in…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review (2009)Methods for the synthesis of …The qualitative content analysis process (2008)The qualitative content analy…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Practical Meta-AnalysisSystematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…A systematic meta-review of organizational diversity and inclusion interventions and their associated outcomes (2025)A systematic meta-review of o…Systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity interventions to increase elementary children’s motor competence: a comprehensive school physical activity program perspective (2024)Systematic review and meta-an…Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies (2024)Systematic Review (2003–2023)…A meta-review of literature reviews of disability, travel and inequalities (2024)A meta-review of literature r…The evidence-base for positive psychology interventions: a mega-analysis of meta-analyses (2023)The evidence-base for positiv…How, when, and why is social class linked to mental health and wellbeing? A systematic meta-review (2023)How, when, and why is social …COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence (2023)COVID-19 and common mental he…Strategies for Identification of Intimate Partner Violence in Healthcare Settings: Overview of Reviews and Realist Synthesis (2022)Strategies for Identification…ccaR : A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews (2022)ccaR : A package for assessin…Umbrella reviews (systematic review of reviews) (2021)Umbrella reviews (systematic …Multimedia Design for Learning: An Overview of Reviews With Meta-Meta-Analysis (2021)Multimedia Design for Learnin…Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms (2021)Harms in Systematic Reviews P…Global mapping of overviews of systematic reviews in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis (2021)Global mapping of overviews o…Best Practices for Meta-Reviews in Physical Activity and Health Research: Insights From the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Advisory Committee Scientific Report (2021)Best Practices for Meta-Revie…A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses on Socioeconomic Status, Cognitive Ability, and Achievement: The Need to Focus on Specific Pathways (2020)A Systematic Overview of Meta…How best to reduce unhealthy risk-taking behaviours? A meta-review of evidence syntheses of interventions using self-regulation principles (2019)How best to reduce unhealthy …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis (2016)The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2016)Developing Design Propositions through Research Synthesis (2008)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review (2018)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (2014)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2008The qualitative content analysis process22,573 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2000Practical Meta-Analysis9,196 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2012Beyond PICO2,604 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2010Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates2,081 cited
  • 2009Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review2,049 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2014Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview1,308 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Multimedia Design for Learning: An Overview of Reviews With Meta-Meta-Analysis148 cited
    • 2023COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence135 cited
    • 2020A Systematic Overview of Meta-Analyses on Socioeconomic Status, Cognitive Ability, and Achievement: The Need to Focus on Specific Pathways92 cited
    • 2023The evidence-base for positive psychology interventions: a mega-analysis of meta-analyses91 cited
    • 2021Umbrella reviews (systematic review of reviews)74 cited
    • 2022ccaR : A package for assessing primary study overlap across systematic reviews in overviews57 cited
    • 2021Global mapping of overviews of systematic reviews in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020: a bibliometric analysis46 cited
    • 2024Systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity interventions to increase elementary children’s motor competence: a comprehensive school physical activity program perspective38 cited
    • 2023How, when, and why is social class linked to mental health and wellbeing? A systematic meta-review37 cited
    • 2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms31 cited
    • 2024Systematic Review (2003–2023): Exploring Technology-Supported Cross-Cultural Learning through Review Studies30 cited
    • 2019How best to reduce unhealthy risk-taking behaviours? A meta-review of evidence syntheses of interventions using self-regulation principles27 cited
    • 2024A meta-review of literature reviews of disability, travel and inequalities24 cited
    • 2025A systematic meta-review of organizational diversity and inclusion interventions and their associated outcomes20 cited
    • 2022Strategies for Identification of Intimate Partner Violence in Healthcare Settings: Overview of Reviews and Realist Synthesis16 cited
    • 2021Best Practices for Meta-Reviews in Physical Activity and Health Research: Insights From the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Advisory Committee Scientific Report15 cited