Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Managing the Growth of Peer Review at the Royal Society Journals, 1865-1965

16 references·12 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
2009How Professors Think1,084 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition685 cited
2008The Scientific Life563 cited
2015The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing396 cited
2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
2007Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies*298 cited
2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
2017Gender in the Journals: Publication Patterns in Political Science282 cited
1991New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System248 cited
2016The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise246 cited
1983Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science238 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1988Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates234 cited

2017Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research217 cited

Cited by

2020Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports35 cited
2021Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals30 cited
2022Scholarly Publishing, Boundary Processes, and the Problem of Fake Peer Reviews27 cited
2020Linguistic Variation and Change in 250 Years of English Scientific Writing: A Data-Driven Approach25 cited
2024Peer-review procedures as practice, decision, and governance—the road to theories of peer review22 cited
2022Can transparency undermine peer review? A simulation model of scientist behavior under open peer review22 cited
2021The oracles of science: On grant peer review and competitive funding15 cited
2022Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals14 cited
2020Reading Peer Review14 cited
2023The academic status of reviewers predicts their language use14 cited
2022Measuring the effect of reviewers on manuscript change: A study on a sample of submissions to Royal Society journals (2006–2017)10 cited
2023Publishing review reports to reveal and preserve the quality and fairness of the peer review process10 cited