SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking
1 references·5 citing·21 second hop
What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking (2019)What is an invasive procedure? A definiti…The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The Reporting of Randomized C…Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review (2024)Examining the application of …Methodological quality for systematic reviews of adverse events with surgical interventions: a cross-sectional survey (2021)Methodological quality for sy…The use of micro-costing in economic analyses of surgical interventions: a systematic review (2020)The use of micro-costing in e…A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials (2020)A systematic review of report…A systematic review and in‐depth analysis of outcome reporting in early phase studies of colorectal cancer surgical innovation (2020)A systematic review and in‐de…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies (2007)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions (2013)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation (2009)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement140 cited

Cited by

  • 2020The use of micro-costing in economic analyses of surgical interventions: a systematic review56 cited
  • 2020A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials11 cited
  • 2020A systematic review and in‐depth analysis of outcome reporting in early phase studies of colorectal cancer surgical innovation11 cited
  • 2024Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review7 cited
  • 2021Methodological quality for systematic reviews of adverse events with surgical interventions: a cross-sectional survey7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work