SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is Scientific Medical Literature Related to Endometriosis Treatment Evidence-Based? A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials
12 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Is Scientific Medical Literature Related to Endometriosis Treatment Evidence-Based? A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials (2019)Is Scientific Medical Literature Related …Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered? (2015)Randomized controlled trials …Randomized controlled trials and neuro-oncology: should alternative designs be considered? (2015)Randomized controlled trials …International Scientific Publication in ISI Journals: Chances and Obstacles (2015)International Scientific Publ…Restoring the pharmaceutical industry's reputation (2014)Restoring the pharmaceutical …Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals (2014)Methodological Reporting of R…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Understanding randomised controlled trials (2005)Understanding randomised cont…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)The Pew Charitable Trusts (1994)Strategic trends in the drug industry (2003)In the land of pharma: A qualitative analysis of the reputational discourse of the pharmaceutical industry (2018)Why Are We Failing to Address the Issue of Access to Insulin? A National and Global Perspective (2018)Sustainability in the pharmaceutical industry—An assessment of sustainability maturity and effects of sustainability measure implementation on supply chain security (2023)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2005)Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research (2019)Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)Citation classics in neuro-oncology: assessment of historical trends and scientific progress (2017)Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials—Distance Travelled (2017)Randomized controlled trials comparing surgery to non-operative management in neurosurgery: a systematic review (2019)Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance (2002)Trends in the Usage of ISI Bibliometric Data: Uses, Abuses, and Implications (2005)Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system (2009)Acquisition or Disposal: the Problem of the Choice of a Self-Improvement Strategy by Students (2017)GENDER ASYMMETRY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES (2017)RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT (2017)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2005Understanding randomised controlled trials458 cited
  • 2015Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?83 cited
  • 2014Restoring the pharmaceutical industry's reputation70 cited
  • 2015International Scientific Publication in ISI Journals: Chances and Obstacles45 cited
  • 2015Randomized controlled trials and neuro-oncology: should alternative designs be considered?11 cited
  • 2014Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals9 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work