Informal Settlement as a Mode of Production

Abstract

Informal settlements are neighborhoods developed largely without state control that currently house over a billion people globally. Not to be confused with “slums” or “squatting,” informality is the means through which a substantial portion of the global population have managed the transition from rural to urban life, transforming many cities across the Global South in the process. While some would hesitate to call this urban design or planning, it is where the action has been happening in urban development. The scope of such settlement – now housing over a billion people and growing – means that most informal settlements will not be erased and replaced – the task is one of incremental redevelopment in situ . Yet traditional forms of urban design practice – focused on top-down regulation and the production of fixed designs and master plans – have proven both destructive and blind to the dynamism, complexity, and adaptability of informal urbanism. Informal and formal urbanisms are not binary opposites but intersect to form complex alliances, contradictions, and possibilities. Informal settlement can be understood as a mode of production that works both with and against the formal structures of the city. It engenders new spatial structures and neighborhood morphologies that need to be understood as assets held by the urban poor. And it leads to particular kinds of place identity that impact on the image of the city and political struggles over the right to the city. This chapter shows how assemblage thinking can provide insight into urban informality and new directions for urban design thinking.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.