SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Identifying and resolving the frustrations of reviewing the improvement literature: The experiences of two improvement researchers
16 references·0 citing·37 second hopsampled
Identifying and resolving the frustrations of reviewing the improvement literature: The experiences of two improvement researchers (2019)Identifying and resolving the frustration…Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Clarifying differences betwee…The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)The behaviour change wheel: A…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Preferred reporting items for…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure (2009)Dynamic capabilities through …Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions? (2009)Can We Systematically Review …A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration (2008)The SQUIRE (Standards for QUa…Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review (2007)Application of statistical pr…Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme (2006)Guidance on the conduct of na…The integrative review: updated methodology (2005)The integrative review: updat…Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Effectiveness and efficiency …Developing strategic continuous improvement capability (1999)Developing strategic continuo…Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020)Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (1978)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem (2008)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior (2004)Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness (2008)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature (2016)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES (2003)Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review (2005)Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods (2005)Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,382 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,725 cited
  • 2011The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions14,850 cited
  • 2010Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement12,421 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
  • 2005The integrative review: updated methodology11,657 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2006Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme2,327 cited
  • 2005Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources2,049 cited
  • 2012Clarifying differences between review designs and methods1,087 cited
  • 2009Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure531 cited
  • 2008The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

446 cited
  • 2007Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review434 cited
  • 2009Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions?407 cited
  • 1999Developing strategic continuous improvement capability405 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.