SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of Publication Trends of Systematic Reviews and Randomized Clinical Trials, 1995 to 2017
4 references·16 citing·44 second hop
Assessment of Publication Trends of Systematic Reviews and Randomized Clinical Trials, 1995 to 2017 (2019)Assessment of Publication Trends of Syste…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Weighted corrected covered area (wCCA): A measure of informational overlap among reviews (2025)Weighted corrected covered ar…Artificial Intelligence Software to Accelerate Screening for Living Systematic Reviews (2025)Artificial Intelligence Softw…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines (2023)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Publication hyper-inflation in the field of intensive care (2023)Publication hyper-inflation i…Transforming evidence for policy: do we have the evidence generation house in order? (2022)Transforming evidence for pol…Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study (2022)Three out of four published s…Critical Appraisal of a Systematic Review: A Concise Review (2022)Critical Appraisal of a Syste…Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index (2022)Assessing the robustness of r…Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package (2022)Assessing and visualizing fra…The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence (2021)The REPRISE project: protocol…The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross‐sectional study (2021)The application of AMSTAR2 in…Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological study (2021)Methodological quality was cr…Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors (2021)Bayesian Methods for Meta-Ana…Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview (2021)Adoption of peer review of li…Estimating the reference range from a meta‐analysis (2020)Estimating the reference rang…Meta-analysis Metastasis (2019)Meta-analysis MetastasisThe file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Fear of COVID-19 and its association with mental health-related factors: systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science (2022)Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews (2023)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Appraisal methods and outcomes of AMSTAR 2 assessments in overviews of systematic reviews of interventions in the cardiovascular field: A methodological study (2023)Single-Session Interventions for Mental Health Problems and Service Engagement: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2025)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library (2022)A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics (2025)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Evaluation of tools used to assess adherence to PRISMA 2020 reveals inconsistent methods and poor tool implementability: part I of a systematic review (2026)Reevaluation of statistically significant meta‐analyses in advanced cancer patients using the Hartung–Knapp method and prediction intervals—A methodological study (2021)Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review (2022)User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited

Cited by

  • 2021The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence55 cited
  • 2021Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological study38 cited
  • 2023Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatment interventions for Internet use disorders: Critical analysis of the methodical quality according to the PRISMA guidelines35 cited
  • 2022Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index35 cited
  • 2021The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross‐sectional study30 cited
  • 2022Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package30 cited
  • 2022Critical Appraisal of a Systematic Review: A Concise Review29 cited
  • 2020Estimating the reference range from a meta‐analysis24 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors
21 cited
  • 2019Meta-analysis Metastasis20 cited
  • 2022Transforming evidence for policy: do we have the evidence generation house in order?16 cited
  • 2025Artificial Intelligence Software to Accelerate Screening for Living Systematic Reviews15 cited
  • 2023Publication hyper-inflation in the field of intensive care14 cited
  • 2022Three out of four published systematic reviews on COVID-19 treatments were not registered and one-third of those registered were published: a meta-research study14 cited
  • 2021Adoption of peer review of literature search strategies in knowledge synthesis from 2009 to 2018: An overview14 cited
  • 2025Weighted corrected covered area (wCCA): A measure of informational overlap among reviews13 cited