A comparative case study of couples programming to support relationship quality in Nepal and Rwanda

Erin A. Stern · Susi McGhee · Gemma Ferguson · Cari J. Clark

11 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Social and Personal Relationships

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Intimate Partner and Family Violence Family Dynamics and Relationships Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Abstract

Although intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most common form of violence against women, there is limited understanding of best practices to prevent IPV through working directly with couples and supporting quality of relationships. There are valid concerns of safely conducting research and programming with couples. Yet couples programming responds to the fact that many couples may want to stay together but require support and skills to manage violence. This article compares evaluation data of two programs in Nepal and Rwanda that worked with couples to support relationship quality. The Indashyikirwa program in Rwanda implemented a 5-month curriculum with couples to support equitable, nonviolent relationships. Approximately 25% of trained partners of couples were further supported as community activists for an additional 2 years. Change Starts at Home in Nepal implemented a 9-month couples’ curriculum to promote equitable and violence free relationships through fostering mutual respect and understanding, alongside a weekly radio program. The last 3 months of the curriculum focused on community outreach and awareness. This article draws on longitudinal qualitative interviews conducted separately with 28 partners of couples before, immediately after and 1 year following the couples’ curriculum in Rwanda, and with 36 partners of couples before, 6 months into the curriculum, and at the end of the intervention in Nepal. Thematic analysis of couples’ accounts was conducted and compared across the two studies. Despite the different interventions and settings, the cross-comparative analysis suggests similar pathways of change among couples, including enhanced relationship quality and skills as mediators to prevent IPV. This article considers how both programs supported greater communication and conflict resolution skills and a sense of unity and shared power among couples. The findings suggest the value of couples programming within the context of an enabling environment, highly trained facilitators, and strong referral networks.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

References

2006Using thematic analysis in psychology 2013The Global Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women 2004Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa 2010Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: a cohort study 2000The Measurement of Perceived Relationship Quality Components: A Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach 2014Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say?2005Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach 2010Approaches to and Outcomes of Dyadic Interview Analysis

Cited by

2023Violence Against Women: A Persistent and Rising Problem

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.